Boards Results

2020 CHAMPIONSHIP TEAMS - MATCH 7

Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -290

Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

12 HANLEY Team 18 WATERFIELD Team 2 E 8H 9 110 -5 5

17 GOSNEY Team 2 THOMAS Team 2 W AD 8 110 10 -10

5 TOOMER Team 9 WILLOCK Team 2NT E 6S 8 120 -8 8

1 WARDROP Team 11 CAPE Team 2NT E 6S 8 120 11 -11

7 ROUTLEY Team 14 BENNION Team 3 E 8H 11 150 10 -10

3 WILKINSON Team 6 CRESTANELLI Team 3NT E 6S 10 630 0 0

4 HYLAND Team 8 BURNAGE Team 3NT E 6C 7 200 13 -13

11 CAPE Team 1 WARDROP Team 3NT E 6S 11 660 -11 11

10 BAILEY Team 13 WOODROW Team 3NT W QH 8 100 0 0

18 WATERFIELD Team 12 HANLEY Team 3NT W 9H 8 100 5 -5

16 PRIDHAM Team 15 WINDSOR Team 3NT W QH 11 660 -1 1

15 WINDSOR Team 16 PRIDHAM Team 3NT W QH 10 630 1 -1

14 BENNION Team 7 ROUTLEY Team 3NT W 9H 10 630 -10 10

13 WOODROW Team 10 BAILEY Team 3NT W QH 8 100 0 0

9 WILLOCK Team 5 TOOMER Team 3NT W 9H 7 200 8 -8

8 BURNAGE Team 4 HYLAND Team 3NT W QH 9 600 -13 13

6 CRESTANELLI Team 3 WILKINSON Team 3NT W QH 10 630 0 0

2 THOMAS Team 17 GOSNEY Team 3NT W JC 9 600 -10 10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by EW -2 200 1
3NT by EW -2 200 1
3NT by EW -1 100 3
2 by EW = -110 1
2 by EW +1 -110 1
2NT by EW = -120 2
3 by EW +2 -150 1
3NT by EW = -600 2
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
3NT by EW +1 -630 3
3NT by EW +2 -660 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
12 HANLEY Team	18 WATERFIELD Team	2 E	8H	9		110	-5	5
17 GOSNEY Team	2 THOMAS Team	2 W	AD	8		110	10	-10
5 TOOMER Team	9 WILLOCK Team	2NT E	6S	8		120	-8	8
1 WARDROP Team	11 CAPE Team	2NT E	6S	8		120	11	-11
7 ROUTLEY Team	14 BENNION Team	3 E	8H	11		150	10	-10
3 WILKINSON Team	6 CRESTANELLI Team	3NT E	6S	10		630	0	0
4 HYLAND Team	8 BURNAGE Team	3NT E	6C	7	200		13	-13
11 CAPE Team	1 WARDROP Team	3NT E	6S	11		660	-11	11
10 BAILEY Team	13 WOODROW Team	3NT W	QH	8	100		0	0
18 WATERFIELD Team	12 HANLEY Team	3NT W	9H	8	100		5	-5
16 PRIDHAM Team	15 WINDSOR Team	3NT W	QH	11		660	-1	1
15 WINDSOR Team	16 PRIDHAM Team	3NT W	QH	10		630	1	-1
14 BENNION Team	7 ROUTLEY Team	3NT W	9H	10		630	-10	10
13 WOODROW Team	10 BAILEY Team	3NT W	QH	8	100		0	0
9 WILLOCK Team	5 TOOMER Team	3NT W	9H	7	200		8	-8
8 BURNAGE Team	4 HYLAND Team	3NT W	QH	9		600	-13	13
6 CRESTANELLI Team	3 WILKINSON Team	3NT W	QH	10		630	0	0
2 THOMAS Team	17 GOSNEY Team	3NT W	JC	9		600	-10	10

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	3
2 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	2
3 by EW	+2	-150	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	2
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
3NT by EW	+1	-630	3
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1